R v T'Shai Ennis
None of the grounds of appeal were arguable; the directions to the jury were legally correct, the evidence was properly admitted, the adverse inference direction was justified, and the fresh evidence did not undermine the safety of the conviction. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused as there was no prospect of success.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: T'Shai Ennis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Joint Enterprise, Murder, Wounding With Intent, Admissibility of Evidence, Fresh Evidence, Adverse Inference, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
T'Shai Ennis
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jury was wrongly directed on joint enterprise in light of R v Jogee
- 2 Whether evidence relating to rap music and bandanas should have been admitted
- 3 Whether the adverse inference direction in relation to silence was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
None of the grounds of appeal were arguable; the directions to the jury were legally correct, the evidence was properly admitted, the adverse inference direction was justified, and the fresh evidence did not undermine the safety of the conviction. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused as there was no prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Renewed application for extension of time and leave to appeal against conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment