R v T'Shai Ennis

R v T'Shai Ennis

None of the grounds of appeal were arguable; the directions to the jury were legally correct, the evidence was properly admitted, the adverse inference direction was justified, and the fresh evidence did not undermine the safety of the conviction. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused as there was no prospect of success.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: T'Shai Ennis
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Joint Enterprise, Murder, Wounding With Intent, Admissibility of Evidence, Fresh Evidence, Adverse Inference, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

T'Shai Ennis

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the jury was wrongly directed on joint enterprise in light of R v Jogee
  2. 2 Whether evidence relating to rap music and bandanas should have been admitted
  3. 3 Whether the adverse inference direction in relation to silence was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

None of the grounds of appeal were arguable; the directions to the jury were legally correct, the evidence was properly admitted, the adverse inference direction was justified, and the fresh evidence did not undermine the safety of the conviction. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused as there was no prospect of success.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Renewed application for extension of time and leave to appeal against conviction refused