Tunde Timea Bujoreanu v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with tribunal directions to provide a copy of the decision challenged, and failed to co-operate to such an extent that the tribunal could not deal with the proceedings fairly and justly.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tunde Timea Bujoreanu; Respondent: The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Case Management Order
- Outcome
- appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- Case Management, Striking Out, Procedural Compliance
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tunde Timea Bujoreanu
Appellant
The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Case Management Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant complied with tribunal directions to provide a copy of the challenged decision
- 2 Whether the appeal should be struck out for failure to comply with procedural requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with tribunal directions to provide a copy of the decision challenged, and failed to co-operate to such an extent that the tribunal could not deal with the proceedings fairly and justly.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out
Orders
- The appeal is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Neutral Citation Number:- [2025] UKFTT 00621 (GRC) Case No. FT-D-2024-0989 Decision Given on: 02 June 2025 In the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Transport Before: Judge Mornington Appellant: Respondent(s): The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors Tunde Timea Bujoreanu Case Management Order (The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009) It is ordered:- 1. The Appeal is struck out. REASONS 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. On 6 November 2024, the Appellant filed a GRC1 seeking to challenge a decision of the Respondent. This was incomplete because it did not include a copy of the decision they sought to challenge. On 5 December 2024, the Tribunal gave a Case Management Direction to provide a copy of the decision that the Appellant sought to challenge within 28 days. On 23 January 2025, the Tribunal issued a further Case Management Direction to the Appellant to provide a copy of the decision they seek to challenge by no later than 6 February 2025. The Appellant was warned that failure to comply with this direction could lead to the Tribunal striking out the appeal. Rule 22(3) requires the Appellant to provide a copy of any written record of the decision they seek to challenge by way of their appeal. Under Rule 8(3), the Tribunal may strike out a case where; (a) the Appellant has failed to comply with a direction which stated that failure by the appellant to comply with the direction could lead to the striking out of the proceedings or part of them; or The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 can be found online at https://www.gov.uk/courts-tribunals/first-tier-tribunal-general-regulatory-chamber (b) the Appellant has failed to co-operate with the Tribunal to such an extent that the Tribunal cannot deal with the proceedings fairly and justly. 7. Both circumstances are met in this case and the appeal is therefore struck out. Signed: Judge Mornington Date: 2 June 2025 2