R v Tyler Moore

R v Tyler Moore

The trial judge correctly admitted the conviction of the co-defendant under section 74 PACE, as it did not unfairly close off Moore's defence or prejudice the fairness of the trial; the application for permission to appeal is not arguable.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Tyler Moore
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Prior Convictions, Joint Enterprise, Fairness of Trial, Section 74 and 78 PACE
Criminal Law Admissibility of Prior Convictions Joint Enterprise Fairness of Trial Section 74 and 78 PACE

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Tyler Moore

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting proof of co-defendant's conviction under section 74 of PACE
  2. 2 Whether admission of the conviction unfairly prejudiced the appellant's defence
  3. 3 Whether the acquittal of a co-defendant in an earlier trial should have been disclosed to the jury

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge correctly admitted the conviction of the co-defendant under section 74 PACE, as it did not unfairly close off Moore's defence or prejudice the fairness of the trial; the application for permission to appeal is not arguable.

Court Disposition

application for permission to appeal refused