Bakac, R v
The applicant was able to present his defence with the admissions made by the prosecution; there was no unfair disadvantage or error of law in the disclosure rulings. The grounds of appeal do not cast doubt on the safety of the conviction.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Ugur Bakac; Co Accused: Barack Gurgur
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Customs Offences, Disclosure, Public Interest Immunity, Loss of Time Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Ugur Bakac
Applicant
Barack Gurgur
Co Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution failed in its duty of disclosure
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in upholding public interest immunity
- 3 Whether the applicant was unfairly disadvantaged in his defence
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was able to present his defence with the admissions made by the prosecution; there was no unfair disadvantage or error of law in the disclosure rulings. The grounds of appeal do not cast doubt on the safety of the conviction.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed
- 42 days of time spent in custody not to count towards sentence (loss of time order)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment