BT Pension Scheme Trustees Limited & Ors (R on the application of) v UK Statistics Authority & Anor
The UK Statistics Authority acted within its statutory powers under s.21(1) of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 in deciding to align the RPI with the CPIH, as the statute confers broad discretion to make fundamental changes to the RPI, including adopting methodologies from other indices. The Authority was not required to consider the impact on legacy users or to weigh broader policy interests, as its statutory functions are limited to statistical matters. There was no duty to consult on the principle of the RPI decision, and the consultation conducted was adequate. The cessation clause in post-2005 gilts would not be triggered by the RPI decision, as the RPI would continue...
- Parties
- Claimant: BT Pension Scheme Trustees Limited; Claimant: Marks and Spencer Pension Trust Limited; Claimant: Ford Pension Scheme for Senior Staff Trustees Limited; Claimant: Ford Salaried Pension Fund Trustees Limited; Claimant: Ford Pension Fund Trustees Limited; Defendant: UK Statistics Authority; Defendant: Chancellor of the Exchequer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; declaration granted to second defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Statutory Duties, Consultation Requirements, Public Sector Equality Duty, Pensions, Government Bonds, Official Statistics, Ultra Vires, Legitimate Expectation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BT Pension Scheme Trustees Limited
Claimant
Marks and Spencer Pension Trust Limited
Claimant
Ford Pension Scheme for Senior Staff Trustees Limited
Claimant
Ford Salaried Pension Fund Trustees Limited
Claimant
Ford Pension Fund Trustees Limited
Claimant
UK Statistics Authority
Defendant
Chancellor of the Exchequer
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the UK Statistics Authority's decision to align the RPI with the CPIH was ultra vires under s.21(1) of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007
- 2 Whether the UKSA failed to consider material considerations, including the impact on legacy users and the Public Sector Equality Duty
- 3 Whether there was a duty to consult on the RPI decision and whether such consultation was adequate
Ratio Decidendi
The UK Statistics Authority acted within its statutory powers under s.21(1) of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 in deciding to align the RPI with the CPIH, as the statute confers broad discretion to make fundamental changes to the RPI, including adopting methodologies from other indices. The Authority was not required to consider the impact on legacy users or to weigh broader policy interests, as its statutory functions are limited to statistical matters. There was no duty to consult on the principle of the RPI decision, and the consultation conducted was adequate. The cessation clause in post-2005 gilts would not be triggered by the RPI decision, as the RPI would continue...
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; declaration granted to second defendant.
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed.
- Declaration granted that the cessation clause in post-2005 gilts will not be triggered by the implementation of the RPI decision in or after 2030.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment