Edmonds v Lawson & Anor (t/a Lawson Developments)

Edmonds v Lawson & Anor (t/a Lawson Developments)

There was no promise by Ulrik Lawson to give priority to Noel Edmonds' contribution; the claimant is not entitled to the claimed payment of £300,000. The claimant is entitled to a half share of maintenance and outgoings for Wood House, and the defendants are entitled to payment for construction works at St Serf valued on a quantum meruit basis.

Parties
Claimant: Noel Edmonds; Defendant: Ulrik Lawson; Defendant: Judy Lawson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claimant's claim for priority repayment dismissed; defendants' counterclaim for construction works allowed.
Legal Topics
Joint Venture Agreements, Quantum Meruit, Priority of Charges, VAT Liability, Listed Building Consent
Contract Law Property Law Construction Law Joint Venture Agreements Quantum Meruit Priority of Charges VAT Liability Listed Building Consent

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Noel Edmonds

Claimant

Ulrik Lawson

Defendant

Judy Lawson

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was an agreement for priority repayment of the claimant's contribution to the joint venture
  2. 2 Entitlement to damages under the joint venture agreement
  3. 3 Valuation of construction works on a quantum meruit basis

Ratio Decidendi

There was no promise by Ulrik Lawson to give priority to Noel Edmonds' contribution; the claimant is not entitled to the claimed payment of £300,000. The claimant is entitled to a half share of maintenance and outgoings for Wood House, and the defendants are entitled to payment for construction works at St Serf valued on a quantum meruit basis.

Court Disposition

Claimant's claim for priority repayment dismissed; defendants' counterclaim for construction works allowed.

Orders

  • Claimant entitled to balancing payment for maintenance and outgoings on Wood House.
  • Defendants entitled to £683,512 less monies already paid by claimant for St Serf works.