Woolley & Anor v Ultimate Products Ltd & Anor

Woolley & Anor v Ultimate Products Ltd & Anor

The defendants' use of the HENLEYS mark for watches constitutes passing off against the claimants' goodwill in the HENLEY mark, due to substantial similarity in marks, presentation, and overlapping sales channels, leading to misrepresentation and likely damage. No passing off was established for jewellery or bags, as goodwill in those products was minimal and no deception was found.

Parties
Claimant: Nigel Woolley; Claimant: Timesource Limited; Defendant: Ultimate Products Limited; Defendant: Henley’s Clothing Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim for passing off in relation to watches succeeds; claim for jewellery and bags dismissed.
Legal Topics
Passing Off, Trademark, Goodwill, Misrepresentation, Damage
Intellectual Property Tort Passing Off Trademark Goodwill Misrepresentation Damage

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nigel Woolley

Claimant

Timesource Limited

Claimant

Ultimate Products Limited

Defendant

Henley’s Clothing Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants' use of the HENLEYS mark constitutes passing off against the claimants' HENLEY mark in relation to watches, jewellery, and bags.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants have established goodwill in the HENLEY mark for watches, jewellery, and bags.
  3. 3 Whether there is misrepresentation by the defendants leading or likely to lead the public to believe that HENLEYS goods are those of the claimants.

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants' use of the HENLEYS mark for watches constitutes passing off against the claimants' goodwill in the HENLEY mark, due to substantial similarity in marks, presentation, and overlapping sales channels, leading to misrepresentation and likely damage. No passing off was established for jewellery or bags, as goodwill in those products was minimal and no deception was found.

Court Disposition

Claim for passing off in relation to watches succeeds; claim for jewellery and bags dismissed.

Orders

  • Declaration of passing off in relation to watches.
  • Dismissal of passing off claim for jewellery and bags.