Nursing and Midwifery Council v Raggoo [2011] EWHC 261 (Admin) (08 February 2011)

There is no reason why the interim suspension order should not be extended as the respondent was properly notified and has not appeared to contest the application.

Citation: [2011] EWHC 261 (Admin)
Parties: Claimant: Nursing and Midwifery Council; Defendant: Umma Devi Raggoo
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 08 February 2011
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order / Hearing of Application
Outcome: application granted
Legal Topics: Interim Suspension Order, Extension of Order, Regulatory Proceedings

Professional Regulation Health Law Interim Suspension Order Extension of Order Regulatory Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Nursing and Midwifery Council

Claimant

Umma Devi Raggoo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order / Hearing of Application

Legal Issues

1 Whether the interim suspension order against the respondent should be extended

Ratio Decidendi

There is no reason why the interim suspension order should not be extended as the respondent was properly notified and has not appeared to contest the application.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

Interim suspension order extended to 4pm on 18 February 2012
Respondent granted permission to apply to vary or discharge the order with three days' written notice