Pollard, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1738 (26 November 2025)

The original suspended sentence was unduly lenient given the seriousness and aggravating features of the offences; a sentence of 32 months' immediate custody would have been appropriate, but in light of the flawed Goodyear indication and fairness, the sentence is increased to 2 years' immediate imprisonment, concurrent on both counts, with the restraining order to remain.

Citation: [2025] EWCA Crim 1738
Parties: Prosecution: Rex; Offender: Luke Pollard
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 26 November 2025
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome: appeal allowed; sentence increased
Legal Topics: Unduly Lenient Sentence, Domestic Abuse, Controlling and Coercive Behaviour, Grievous Bodily Harm, Goodyear Indication, Sentencing Guidelines

Criminal Law Unduly Lenient Sentence Domestic Abuse Controlling and Coercive Behaviour Grievous Bodily Harm Goodyear Indication Sentencing Guidelines

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Luke Pollard

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Appeal Against Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Legal Issues

1 Whether the original sentence was unduly lenient
2 Proper categorisation of offences for sentencing guidelines
3 Effect of procedural errors in Goodyear indication

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; sentence increased

Orders

Original suspended sentences quashed
2 years' immediate imprisonment imposed concurrently on both counts