Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v I Khan & Anor
The employment tribunal's findings were not perverse; it was open to the tribunal to conclude that Mr Khan assaulted Mr Da Cruz and that Mr Ali's conduct did not amount to gross misconduct. The failure to finalise Mr Singh's evidence before dismissal rendered the process procedurally unfair. The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Respondent/cross Appellant: Mr I Khan; Respondent/cross Appellant: Mr M Ali
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Wrongful Dismissal, Gross Misconduct, Procedural Fairness, Perversity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Appellant/respondent
Mr I Khan
Respondent/cross Appellant
Mr M Ali
Respondent/cross Appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employment tribunal's findings on wrongful and unfair dismissal were perverse
- 2 Whether the failure to finalise evidence from a key witness rendered the dismissals procedurally unfair
- 3 Whether Mr Ali's conduct constituted gross misconduct
Ratio Decidendi
The employment tribunal's findings were not perverse; it was open to the tribunal to conclude that Mr Khan assaulted Mr Da Cruz and that Mr Ali's conduct did not amount to gross misconduct. The failure to finalise Mr Singh's evidence before dismissal rendered the process procedurally unfair. The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment