Colt Group Ltd v Unicourt Wandsworth LLB
Where the lease requires the tenant to reinstate and insurance is effected in the names of landlord and tenant, the landlord is obliged to pay over to the tenant any insurance moneys received for the purpose of reinstatement, insofar as those moneys are reasonably required for that purpose. Declaratory relief is appropriate to clarify this obligation, given the legitimate concerns raised and the absence of an express landlord covenant.
- Parties
- Claimant: Colt Group Limited; Defendant: Unicourt Wandsworth LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (declaratory Relief) / Judgment After Trial on Written Evidence
- Outcome
- Declaration granted in part; permission to amend claim form granted only to extent necessary for declaration; permission to amend for second declaration refused.
- Legal Topics
- Insurance Under Leases, Declaratory Relief, Application of Insurance Proceeds, Obligations of Landlord and Tenant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colt Group Limited
Claimant
Unicourt Wandsworth LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (declaratory Relief) / Judgment After Trial on Written Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord is obliged to pay insurance moneys received to the tenant for reinstatement under the lease
- 2 Whether declaratory relief should be granted regarding the application of insurance moneys
Ratio Decidendi
Where the lease requires the tenant to reinstate and insurance is effected in the names of landlord and tenant, the landlord is obliged to pay over to the tenant any insurance moneys received for the purpose of reinstatement, insofar as those moneys are reasonably required for that purpose. Declaratory relief is appropriate to clarify this obligation, given the legitimate concerns raised and the absence of an express landlord covenant.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted in part; permission to amend claim form granted only to extent necessary for declaration; permission to amend for second declaration refused.
Orders
- Declaration: In the event of an insured peril destroying or causing damage to the Property, following which the Tenant is required to rebuild or reinstate the Property pursuant to clauses 2(2) and 2(7) of the Lease, any moneys paid by the insurer to the Landlord under a policy incepted pursuant to clause 2(2) in...
- Permission to amend claim form for second declaration (where reinstatement is impossible) refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment