Deutsche Bank AG [2019] EWHC 969 (Comm) (15 April 2019)
Unitech Limited failed to adduce any evidence of reliance on the alleged misrepresentations. The burden of proof for the misrepresentation defence was not met. The guarantee and indemnity is enforceable, and the sums claimed are due.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 969 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Deutsche Bank AG; Claimant: DBS Bank Limited; Claimant: BBK B. S. C.; Claimant: Shinhan Bank; Claimant: LIREF (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.; Claimant: PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, Tokyo Branch; Claimant: BMI Bank BSC (C); Claimant: DB International (Asia) Limited; Claimant: Axis Specialty Limited; Claimant: DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Limited; Defendant: Unitech Global Limited; Defendant: Unitech Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim (guarantee and Indemnity, Financial Instruments) / Judgment After Trial on the Merits
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimants
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee and Indemnity, Misrepresentation, Interest Rate Swaps, LIBOR, Default and Acceleration, Summary Judgment, Jurisdiction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deutsche Bank AG
Claimant
DBS Bank Limited
Claimant
BBK B. S. C.
Claimant
Shinhan Bank
Claimant
LIREF (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
Claimant
PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, Tokyo Branch
Claimant
BMI Bank BSC (C)
Claimant
DB International (Asia) Limited
Claimant
Axis Specialty Limited
Claimant
DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Limited
Claimant
Unitech Global Limited
Defendant
Unitech Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (guarantee and Indemnity, Financial Instruments) / Judgment After Trial on the Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Unitech Limited is liable under a guarantee and indemnity for unpaid borrowings and swap liabilities of Unitech Global Limited
- 2 Whether Unitech Limited can rely on a misrepresentation defence to rescind the guarantee and indemnity
- 3 Whether the sums claimed are properly calculated and due
Ratio Decidendi
Unitech Limited failed to adduce any evidence of reliance on the alleged misrepresentations. The burden of proof for the misrepresentation defence was not met. The guarantee and indemnity is enforceable, and the sums claimed are due.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimants
Orders
- Judgment against Unitech Limited in favour of the Lenders in the sum of USD 293,476,217.37
- Judgment against Unitech Limited in favour of Deutsche Bank AG for the Early Termination Amount of USD 11,055,487 plus interest of USD 9,631,833.16
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment