Tudor v United Arab Emirates

Tudor v United Arab Emirates

The statements in question were admissible under Section 84(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 as Marin was a competent witness at the putative summary trial, and the evidence as a whole, including corroboration from other witnesses and the victim, was sufficient to establish a case to answer. The use of hearsay evidence did not render the proceedings unfair or infringe the right to a fair trial.

Parties
Claimant: Constantine Florin Tudor; Defendant: United Arab Emirates
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extradition Procedure, Admissibility of Evidence, Hearsay Evidence, Competency of Witnesses
Criminal Law Extradition Law Extradition Procedure Admissibility of Evidence Hearsay Evidence Competency of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Constantine Florin Tudor

Claimant

United Arab Emirates

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Extradition Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the records of interview are admissible statements under Section 84(2) of the Extradition Act 2003
  2. 2 Whether the evidence is sufficient to require an answer by the appellant under Section 84(1)
  3. 3 Whether the use of hearsay evidence infringes the right to a fair trial

Ratio Decidendi

The statements in question were admissible under Section 84(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 as Marin was a competent witness at the putative summary trial, and the evidence as a whole, including corroboration from other witnesses and the victim, was sufficient to establish a case to answer. The use of hearsay evidence did not render the proceedings unfair or infringe the right to a fair trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.