Cook v Spain & Anor

Cook v Spain & Anor

The applicant failed to demonstrate that the passage of time or the conduct of the Spanish authorities rendered his extradition unjust or oppressive. No sufficient evidence of prejudice, hardship, or bad faith was shown. The application for habeas corpus was refused.

Parties
Claimant: David Charles Cook; 1st Defendant: The Government of Spain; 2nd Defendant: The Governor of HMP Brixton
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus / Extradition / Judgment on Application for Habeas Corpus
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Unjust or Oppressive Extradition, Passage of Time in Extradition, Good Faith in Extradition Proceedings
Extradition Law Criminal Law Human Rights Unjust or Oppressive Extradition Passage of Time in Extradition Good Faith in Extradition Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Charles Cook

Claimant

The Government of Spain

1st Defendant

The Governor of HMP Brixton

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Extradition / Judgment on Application for Habeas Corpus

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's extradition would be unjust or oppressive due to the passage of time
  2. 2 Whether the extradition proceedings were brought in good faith

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate that the passage of time or the conduct of the Spanish authorities rendered his extradition unjust or oppressive. No sufficient evidence of prejudice, hardship, or bad faith was shown. The application for habeas corpus was refused.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Application for habeas corpus refused.