Pan NOx Emissions Litigations, Re (Ruling 2) [2024] EWHC 1719 (KB) (17 June 2024)
The court excluded disclosure prior to the 15th to avoid unnecessary disputes and costs, maintained the claimants' proposed paragraph 2 regarding permission to apply, and clarified that future disclosure orders should be made without appointing a Hague commissioner unless necessary.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1719 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Pan NOx Emissions Litigations; Defendant: Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Litigation / Interlocutory Ruling on Disclosure and Costs Management
- Outcome
- Interlocutory order granted as per claimants' proposal with clarifications.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Case Management, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pan NOx Emissions Litigations
Claimant
Unknown
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Litigation / Interlocutory Ruling on Disclosure and Costs Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope and timing of disclosure orders
- 2 Application of previous case management conference (CMC) orders
- 3 Permission to apply for future disclosure orders
Ratio Decidendi
The court excluded disclosure prior to the 15th to avoid unnecessary disputes and costs, maintained the claimants' proposed paragraph 2 regarding permission to apply, and clarified that future disclosure orders should be made without appointing a Hague commissioner unless necessary.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory order granted as per claimants' proposal with clarifications.
Orders
- Disclosure prior to the 15th excluded.
- Future disclosure orders to be made without appointment of a Hague commissioner unless application is made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment