- v - (London : liability to a pay service charge and administration charge) [2014] UKFTT RP_LON_00BA_LSC_2013_0726 (26 February 2014)

- v - (London : liability to a pay service charge and administration charge) [2014] UKFTT RP_LON_00BA_LSC_2013_0726 (26 February 2014)

The tribunal determined whether the charges were properly demanded and reasonable, and whether the respondent was liable under the lease and statutory provisions.

Citation
[2014] UKFTT RP_LON_00BA_LSC_2013_0726
Parties
Applicant (freeholder): Unknown; Respondent: Unknown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 February 2014
Procedural Posture
Service Charge Dispute / First Tier Tribunal Determination
Outcome
Determination made on liability for service charge and administration charge.
Legal Topics
Service Charges, Administration Charges, Liability Under Lease
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Service Charges Administration Charges Liability Under Lease

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unknown

Applicant (freeholder)

Unknown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Service Charge Dispute / First Tier Tribunal Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is liable to pay the service charge and administration charge for Flat 2 Princess Court, 41 Church Road, Mitcham, Surrey

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the charges were properly demanded and reasonable, and whether the respondent was liable under the lease and statutory provisions.

Court Disposition

Determination made on liability for service charge and administration charge.