Jeffries, R v [1997] EWCA Crim 678 (10 March 1997)
The officer's opinion that the notebook entries related to drug sales amounted to an inadmissible opinion on the appellant's guilt, rendering the convictions unsafe.
- Citation
- [1997] EWCA Crim 678
- Parties
- Appellant: Unknown (Appellant); Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Convictions on counts 1 and 3 quashed; sentence on count 2 imposed
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Expert Evidence, Appeal Procedure, Unsafe Conviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Unknown (Appellant)
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the expert evidence of Detective Constable Horton was admissible
- 2 Whether the officer's opinion on the meaning of the notebook entries was permissible
- 3 Whether the convictions were unsafe due to the nature of the expert evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The officer's opinion that the notebook entries related to drug sales amounted to an inadmissible opinion on the appellant's guilt, rendering the convictions unsafe.
Court Disposition
Convictions on counts 1 and 3 quashed; sentence on count 2 imposed
Orders
- Convictions on counts 1 and 3 quashed
- Sentence of four months' imprisonment imposed on count 2 (simple possession)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment