- v - (Southern : Section 48) [2013] UKFTT RP_CHI_00HA_OLR_2012_0179 (12 December 2013)

- v - (Southern : Section 48) [2013] UKFTT RP_CHI_00HA_OLR_2012_0179 (12 December 2013)

The tribunal determined the premium and terms for lease extension due to the respondent's non-compliance with statutory obligations under the 1993 Act.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] UKFTT RP_CHI_00HA_OLR_2012_0179
Parties
Applicant: Unknown Applicant; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Lease Extension Claim / Determination of Premium and Terms
Outcome
Lease extension granted. Premiums determined for each property.
Legal Topics
Lease Extension, Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, Section 39, Non Compliance by Respondent
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Lease Extension Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 Section 39 Non Compliance by Respondent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unknown Applicant

Applicant

Unknown Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Lease Extension Claim / Determination of Premium and Terms

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to lease extension under s.39 of the 1993 Act
  2. 2 Determination of premium payable for lease extension
  3. 3 Effect of respondent's non-compliance

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined the premium and terms for lease extension due to the respondent's non-compliance with statutory obligations under the 1993 Act.

Court Disposition

Lease extension granted. Premiums determined for each property.

Orders

  • Applicant to pay premium of £12,250 for 4 Mayfields, Keynsham, Bristol BS31 1BW.
  • Applicant to pay premium of £11,000 for 7 Mayfields, Keynsham, Bristol BS31 1BW.