194A Dawlish Road, Birmingham, West Midlands, B29 7AR ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2022] UKFTT BIR_00CN_HMK_2022_0003 (22 June 2022)
The Tribunal found that the landlord had committed the relevant offence by operating an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the statutory criteria.
- Citation
- [2022] UKFTT BIR_00CN_HMK_2022_0003
- Parties
- Applicant: Unknown Applicant(s); Respondent: Unknown Respondent(s)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses, Housing Act 2004, Housing and Planning Act 2016
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Unknown Applicant(s)
Applicant
Unknown Respondent(s)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed house in multiple occupation (HMO)
- 2 Whether a rent repayment order should be made under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the landlord had committed the relevant offence by operating an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the statutory criteria.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- The respondent must pay the applicant(s) a specified sum by way of rent repayment order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment