Lunn, R (on the application of) v The Governor of HMP Moorland
The appellant was not unlawfully at large during the period of his release because there was no valid court order authorising his detention at that time; thus, the time spent at liberty due to the court's mistake must be counted towards his sentence.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Jonathan Lunn; Respondent/defendant: Governor of HMP Moorland
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unlawfully at Large, Effect of Court Orders, Prisoner Release, Retrospective Effect of Orders, False Imprisonment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathan Lunn
Appellant/claimant
Governor of HMP Moorland
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time spent at liberty due to a mistaken court order should count towards a prisoner's sentence
- 2 Whether the appellant was 'unlawfully at large' under section 49 of the Prison Act 1952 during the period of mistaken release
- 3 Whether a subsequent amendment to a court order has retrospective effect to render a previously lawful release unlawful
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was not unlawfully at large during the period of his release because there was no valid court order authorising his detention at that time; thus, the time spent at liberty due to the court's mistake must be counted towards his sentence.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- governor’s decision quashed
- matter remitted to the governor to recalculate the appellant’s release date in accordance with the judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment