Brown, R (On the Application Of) v Upper Tribunal
Permission to apply for judicial review is granted on the grounds that there is an arguable case with a reasonable prospect of success regarding the application of the public interest balance and open justice principles, and that the case raises important points of principle or practice. Other grounds were not arguable.
- Parties
- Claimant: Brown; Defendant: Upper Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Permission to apply for judicial review granted on limited grounds
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Sealing of Royal Wills, Open Justice, Freedom of Information Act, Disclosure of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brown
Claimant
Upper Tribunal
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Upper Tribunal and First Tier Tribunal erred in law in refusing disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act
- 2 Whether the public interest and principles of open justice were properly considered
- 3 Whether adequate reasons were given for non-disclosure of the document
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to apply for judicial review is granted on the grounds that there is an arguable case with a reasonable prospect of success regarding the application of the public interest balance and open justice principles, and that the case raises important points of principle or practice. Other grounds were not arguable.
Court Disposition
Permission to apply for judicial review granted on limited grounds
Orders
- Permission to apply for judicial review granted on grounds relating to public interest balance and open justice
- Permission refused on other grounds
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment