Cantillon Ltd v Urvasco Ltd
The adjudicator had jurisdiction to ascertain loss and expense for the period of delay found, not limited to the specific 13 weeks claimed, and did not breach rules of natural justice as Urvasco had opportunity to address quantum for the later period but chose not to; therefore, the adjudicator's decision is enforceable.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cantillon Limited; Defendant: Urvasco Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Claim to Enforce Adjudication Decision / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for Cantillon; adjudicator's decision enforced.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Natural Justice, Jurisdiction, Severability of Adjudicator's Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cantillon Limited
Claimant
Urvasco Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Claim to Enforce Adjudication Decision / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding costs for a period other than the 13 weeks claimed
- 2 Whether the adjudicator breached rules of natural justice by not giving Urvasco opportunity to address costs for the later period
- 3 Whether parts of an adjudicator's decision can be severed for enforcement
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator had jurisdiction to ascertain loss and expense for the period of delay found, not limited to the specific 13 weeks claimed, and did not breach rules of natural justice as Urvasco had opportunity to address quantum for the later period but chose not to; therefore, the adjudicator's decision is enforceable.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Cantillon; adjudicator's decision enforced.
Orders
- Urvasco to pay Cantillon £391,565.60 plus VAT as found by the adjudicator.
- Urvasco to pay 70% of adjudicator's fees (£45,560.63), Cantillon to pay the balance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment