US v SR
Given the parties' conduct, particularly the husband's deliberate non-disclosure and the wife's dissipation of assets, the court ordered a needs-based distribution with a discount to the wife's share reflecting her misconduct, and a punitive costs order against the husband reflecting his litigation misconduct and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: US; Respondent: SR
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedy Proceedings (divorce) / Final Judgment on Distribution and Costs
- Outcome
- Needs-based division of assets with discounted share to wife; punitive costs order against husband.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Remedies, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Litigation Conduct, Costs Orders, Non Disclosure, Needs Based Distribution, Pension Rights, Reattribution of Assets
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
US
Applicant
SR
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Proceedings (divorce) / Final Judgment on Distribution and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 How should the matrimonial assets be distributed given the parties' conduct and needs?
- 2 What is the appropriate costs order in light of litigation misconduct and non-disclosure?
- 3 How should the court address the wife's dissipation of assets and the husband's non-disclosure?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the parties' conduct, particularly the husband's deliberate non-disclosure and the wife's dissipation of assets, the court ordered a needs-based distribution with a discount to the wife's share reflecting her misconduct, and a punitive costs order against the husband reflecting his litigation misconduct and failure to disclose assets.
Court Disposition
Needs-based division of assets with discounted share to wife; punitive costs order against husband.
Orders
- Property R to be sold; net proceeds (after deductions) divided equally.
- Wife to retain Property A and land at K.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment