UTB LLC v Sheffield United Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 914 (Ch) (09 April 2019)
PD51U applies to all proceedings in the Business and Property Courts regardless of prior disclosure orders; permission to amend pleadings is granted only where amendments are relevant and do not introduce new issues late; legal professional privilege is limited to communications for legal advice or litigation, not business or executive functions; disclosure applications must be reasonable, proportionate, and focused on real issues.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 914 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: UTB LLC; Defendant/petitioner/applicant: Sheffield United Limited; Third Party/respondent: HRH Prince Abdullah Bin Mosaad Bin Abuldaziz Al Saud; Fourth Party/respondent: Yusuf Giansiracusa; Respondent: UTB 2018 LLC; Respondent: HRH Prince Musa'ad Bin Khalid M Bin Abdulrahman Al Saud; Respondent: Blades Leisure Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Business and Property Courts Section 994 Companies Act Petition and Commercial Claim / Pre Trial Review; Applications for Disclosure and Permission to Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Application for disclosure to be dealt with under PD51U; permission to amend pleadings granted in part; privilege claims upheld in part; remaining amendments and disclosure requests refused.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Pilot (pd51 U), Legal Professional Privilege, Permission to Amend Pleadings, Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Disputes, Specific Performance, Conspiracy, Corporate Governance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UTB LLC
Claimant/respondent
Sheffield United Limited
Defendant/petitioner/applicant
HRH Prince Abdullah Bin Mosaad Bin Abuldaziz Al Saud
Third Party/respondent
Yusuf Giansiracusa
Fourth Party/respondent
UTB 2018 LLC
Respondent
HRH Prince Musa'ad Bin Khalid M Bin Abdulrahman Al Saud
Respondent
Blades Leisure Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Business and Property Courts Section 994 Companies Act Petition and Commercial Claim / Pre Trial Review; Applications for Disclosure and Permission to Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Applicability of PD51U Disclosure Pilot to proceedings with prior disclosure orders
- 2 Permission to amend pleadings at late stage
- 3 Scope and validity of legal professional privilege claims over documents
Ratio Decidendi
PD51U applies to all proceedings in the Business and Property Courts regardless of prior disclosure orders; permission to amend pleadings is granted only where amendments are relevant and do not introduce new issues late; legal professional privilege is limited to communications for legal advice or litigation, not business or executive functions; disclosure applications must be reasonable, proportionate, and focused on real issues.
Court Disposition
Application for disclosure to be dealt with under PD51U; permission to amend pleadings granted in part; privilege claims upheld in part; remaining amendments and disclosure requests refused.
Orders
- Application for disclosure to proceed under PD51U.
- Permission granted for SUL to amend non-admission to denial in Defence and Counterclaim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment