Uzdon v Romak SA [1998] EWHC 1200 (Comm) (6 November 1998)
The court found that the tribunal acted fairly and impartially, giving both parties reasonable opportunity to present their cases. UZDON's complaints were either unfounded or the result of its own actions. No serious irregularity or substantial injustice was established. The application was refused.
- Citation
- [1998] EWHC 1200 (Comm)
- Parties
- Applicant: UZDON; Respondent: ROMAK
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Act 1996 Section 68 Challenge / Post Award Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Serious Irregularity in Arbitration, Section 68 Arbitration Act 1996, Fair Treatment in Arbitral Proceedings, Substantial Injustice, Costs on Indemnity Basis
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UZDON
Applicant
ROMAK
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Act 1996 Section 68 Challenge / Post Award Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the GAFTA arbitral tribunal failed to comply with section 33 of the Arbitration Act 1996
- 2 Whether any such failure caused substantial injustice to UZDON
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the tribunal acted fairly and impartially, giving both parties reasonable opportunity to present their cases. UZDON's complaints were either unfounded or the result of its own actions. No serious irregularity or substantial injustice was established. The application was refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application by UZDON refused
- ROMAK awarded costs of the application to be taxed on an indemnity basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment