Sutherland & Ors v V2 Music & Ors [2002] EWHC 14 (Ch) (22 January 2002)

Sutherland & Ors v V2 Music & Ors [2002] EWHC 14 (Ch) (22 January 2002)

The claimants retained sufficient residual goodwill in the name 'Liberty' among the public and music industry as of spring 2001; defendants' use of the identical name would likely destroy that goodwill, constituting actionable damage under passing-off principles.

Citation
[2002] EWHC 14 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Kevin Floyd Sutherland; Claimant: Peter Lyall; Claimant: Bryon Michael Bird; Defendant: V2 Music Ltd; Defendant: Jessica Taylor; Defendant: Kevin Simm; Defendant: Tony Lundon; Defendant: Michelle Heaton; Defendant: Kelli Young
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 January 2002
Procedural Posture
Passing Off Action / Judgment After Speedy Trial
Outcome
Judgment for claimants
Legal Topics
Passing Off, Goodwill, Residual Reputation, Damage, Shared Reputation
Intellectual Property Commercial Law Passing Off Goodwill Residual Reputation Damage Shared Reputation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Floyd Sutherland

Claimant

Peter Lyall

Claimant

Bryon Michael Bird

Claimant

V2 Music Ltd

Defendant

Jessica Taylor

Defendant

Kevin Simm

Defendant

Tony Lundon

Defendant

Michelle Heaton

Defendant

Kelli Young

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Passing Off Action / Judgment After Speedy Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants retained sufficient goodwill in the name 'Liberty' to support a passing-off action
  2. 2 Whether the defendants' use of the name 'Liberty' would cause damage to the claimants' goodwill
  3. 3 Whether the existence of other bands named 'Liberty' defeats the claimants' claim

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants retained sufficient residual goodwill in the name 'Liberty' among the public and music industry as of spring 2001; defendants' use of the identical name would likely destroy that goodwill, constituting actionable damage under passing-off principles.

Court Disposition

Judgment for claimants

Orders

  • Court will hear counsel on relief; injunction likely to restrain defendants' use of the name 'Liberty'