Williams v Patrick & Ors [2014] EWHC 4120 (QB) (15 December 2014)
Rule 45(3A) does not apply to local government elections; no evidence of any act, omission, or breach of duty by the Returning Officer; election was conducted substantially in accordance with the law; result was not affected by any alleged breach.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 4120 (QB)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Vernon Williams; First Respondent: Sharon Patrick; First Respondent: Tom Rahilly; First Respondent: Rebecca Rennison; Second Respondent: Tim Shields
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Election, Breach of Election Rules, Application of Parliamentary Rules to Local Elections, Security of Ballot Boxes, Provision of Election Materials
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vernon Williams
Petitioner
Sharon Patrick
First Respondent
Tom Rahilly
First Respondent
Rebecca Rennison
First Respondent
Tim Shields
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does rule 45(3A) of the Parliamentary Rules apply to local government elections?
- 2 Were there breaches of election law by the Returning Officer affecting the validity of the election?
- 3 Was the overnight storage of ballot boxes improper or insecure?
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 45(3A) does not apply to local government elections; no evidence of any act, omission, or breach of duty by the Returning Officer; election was conducted substantially in accordance with the law; result was not affected by any alleged breach.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- First respondents declared duly elected under section 145 of the Representation of the People Act 1983.
- Certification to the High Court of the determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment