Ali v Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive [2009] EWLands ACQ_164_2006 (09 February 2009)

The value of the subject land is £1,000 based on comparable evidence and the claimant's acceptance of the offer; reasonable professional fees are payable in addition.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2009] EWLands ACQ_164_2006
Parties: Claimant: Mussarat Ali; Acquiring Authority: Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 09 February 2009
Procedural Posture: Compensation Reference Under Lands Tribunal Act 1949 / Determination of Compensation for Compulsory Purchase
Outcome: compensation determined for land taken
Legal Topics: Valuation of Land, Compensation Assessment, Freehold and Leasehold Interests

Compulsory Purchase Property Law Valuation of Land Compensation Assessment Freehold and Leasehold Interests

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mussarat Ali

Claimant

Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive

Acquiring Authority

Procedural Posture

Compensation Reference Under Lands Tribunal Act 1949 / Determination of Compensation for Compulsory Purchase

Legal Issues

1 amount of compensation payable for compulsory acquisition of forecourt land
2 valuation of freehold and leasehold interests

Ratio Decidendi

The value of the subject land is £1,000 based on comparable evidence and the claimant's acceptance of the offer; reasonable professional fees are payable in addition.

Court Disposition

compensation determined for land taken

Orders

Compensation for land taken assessed at £1,000 on specified terms.
Reasonable professional fees payable.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.