Ely v Robson

Ely v Robson

The parties reached a sufficiently clear and binding oral agreement in August 2007 as to their respective interests in 6 Torbay Road, which Mr Ely relied upon to his detriment. It would be unconscionable for Ms Robson to assert a contrary interest, and she is estopped from doing so. The judge was entitled to make a declaration limiting Ms Robson's interest to that agreed.

Parties
Claimant: Graham Timothy Ely; Defendant: Vanessa Margot Robson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Beneficial Interests, Settlement Agreements
Property Law Equity Constructive Trust Proprietary Estoppel Beneficial Interests Settlement Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Graham Timothy Ely

Claimant

Vanessa Margot Robson

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the parties reached a binding agreement as to their beneficial interests in 6 Torbay Road in 2007
  2. 2 Whether the agreement was sufficiently certain and intended to be immediately binding
  3. 3 Whether proprietary estoppel or constructive trust arises on the facts

Ratio Decidendi

The parties reached a sufficiently clear and binding oral agreement in August 2007 as to their respective interests in 6 Torbay Road, which Mr Ely relied upon to his detriment. It would be unconscionable for Ms Robson to assert a contrary interest, and she is estopped from doing so. The judge was entitled to make a declaration limiting Ms Robson's interest to that agreed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Declaration as to beneficial interests in 6 Torbay Road stands as made by the trial judge
  • No variation of the trial court's order