Malik v Malik
The judge was correct to refuse summary judgment because the facts regarding Vaqar's intention and the basis of his occupation are unclear and require investigation at trial; the legal position on the effect of occupation by permission of a third party is unsettled; whether there was an abuse of process also...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vaqar Malik; Appellant: Fahim Malik; Appellant: Rahim Malik; Respondent: Iftikhar Ahmad Malik
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Appeal Against Summary Judgment Refusal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Abuse of Process, Summary Judgment, Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vaqar Malik
Appellant
Fahim Malik
Appellant
Rahim Malik
Appellant
Iftikhar Ahmad Malik
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Appeal Against Summary Judgment Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing summary judgment on the adverse possession defence
- 2 Whether the adverse possession defence was an abuse of process
- 3 Whether there was a compelling reason for the matter to go to trial
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was correct to refuse summary judgment because the facts regarding Vaqar's intention and the basis of his occupation are unclear and require investigation at trial; the legal position on the effect of occupation by permission of a third party is unsettled; whether there was an abuse of process also requires a full factual investigation; there are compelling reasons for the matter to proceed to trial.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment