Mubarak v Mubarik & Ors
The court retains jurisdiction to vary the post-nuptial settlement constituted by the IMK Family Trust, as the principal order did not amount to a once-and-for-all capital settlement and expressly kept the variation power open until payment of the lump sum. The applications to set aside the transfer of shares and exclusion fail for lack of requisite intention and because exclusion is not a disposition. The slip rule is applied to correct the principal order to clarify the scope of claims. Discretion is exercised to vary the trust for the benefit of the wife, enabling enforcement of the sums owed under the principal order, given the husband's total failure to pay and the adverse impact on...
- Parties
- Petitioner/wife: Aaliya Mubarak; First Respondent/husband: Iqbal Mubarik; Second Respondent: The Craven Trust Company Limited; Third Respondent: Salem Mubarak; Third Respondent: Noor Mubarak; Fourth Respondent: Osman Mubarak; Fifth Respondent: Hamza Mubarak
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Matrimonial/family / Post Judgment Enforcement and Ancillary Relief Applications
- Outcome
- Applications to set aside the transfer of shares and exclusion dismissed; application to vary the post-nuptial settlement granted; slip rule correction granted.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Post Nuptial Settlement, Enforcement of Financial Orders, Jurisdiction Over Foreign Trusts, Slip Rule Correction, Property Adjustment Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aaliya Mubarak
Petitioner/wife
Iqbal Mubarik
First Respondent/husband
The Craven Trust Company Limited
Second Respondent
Salem Mubarak
Third Respondent
Noor Mubarak
Third Respondent
Osman Mubarak
Fourth Respondent
Hamza Mubarak
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial/family / Post Judgment Enforcement and Ancillary Relief Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of shares into the IMK Family Trust can be set aside under section 37 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 or section 423 Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether the exclusion of the wife from the trust is a disposition under section 37
- 3 Whether the court retains jurisdiction to vary the post-nuptial settlement under section 24(1)(c) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
Ratio Decidendi
The court retains jurisdiction to vary the post-nuptial settlement constituted by the IMK Family Trust, as the principal order did not amount to a once-and-for-all capital settlement and expressly kept the variation power open until payment of the lump sum. The applications to set aside the transfer of shares and exclusion fail for lack of requisite intention and because exclusion is not a disposition. The slip rule is applied to correct the principal order to clarify the scope of claims. Discretion is exercised to vary the trust for the benefit of the wife, enabling enforcement of the sums owed under the principal order, given the husband's total failure to pay and the adverse impact on...
Court Disposition
Applications to set aside the transfer of shares and exclusion dismissed; application to vary the post-nuptial settlement granted; slip rule correction granted.
Orders
- Variation of the IMK Family Trust for the benefit of Aaliya Mubarak to empower and require trustees to pay sums owed under the principal order (lump sum, arrears of periodical payments, costs), subject to pound-for-pound satisfaction and not exceeding trust assets.
- Correction of the principal order under the slip rule to clarify dismissal of remaining property adjustment claims upon payment in full of the lump sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment