FTH LIMITED v VARIS DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

FTH LIMITED v VARIS DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED

There is a real risk that summary enforcement of the adjudication awards would deprive Varis of security for its cross-claim, given FTH's financial position and the nature of its CVA; therefore, summary judgment is refused as a matter of discretion under CPR Part 24.2.

Parties
Claimant: FTH Limited; Defendant: Varis Developments Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Summary judgment refused; no stay required as judgment not entered.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Company Voluntary Arrangement (cva), Summary Judgment, Stay of Execution, Cross Claims
Construction Law Insolvency Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Company Voluntary Arrangement (cva) Summary Judgment Stay of Execution Cross Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FTH Limited

Claimant

Varis Developments Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Construction Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment and Stay of Execution

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should summary judgment be granted to enforce adjudication awards in favour of a company subject to a CVA?
  2. 2 Is there a real risk that enforcement would deprive the defendant of security for its cross-claim?
  3. 3 Should a stay of execution be granted given the claimant's financial position?

Ratio Decidendi

There is a real risk that summary enforcement of the adjudication awards would deprive Varis of security for its cross-claim, given FTH's financial position and the nature of its CVA; therefore, summary judgment is refused as a matter of discretion under CPR Part 24.2.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment refused; no stay required as judgment not entered.