Gerald Metals S.A. v Vasile Frank Timis
The freezing order is continued because Gerald Metals S.A. has a good arguable case in conspiracy and deceit, there is a real risk of dissipation of assets, and the criticisms regarding disclosure and prejudice are not persuasive at this stage.
- Parties
- Claimant: Gerald Metals S.A.; Defendant: Vasile Frank Timis; Defendant: Claudio Buehler; Defendant: Kim Benkert-Naude; Defendant/respondent: Timis Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Application to Continue Freezing Order
- Outcome
- freezing order continued
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunction, Conspiracy, Deceit, Asset Dissipation, Full and Frank Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerald Metals S.A.
Claimant
Vasile Frank Timis
Defendant
Claudio Buehler
Defendant
Kim Benkert-Naude
Defendant
Timis Corporation
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Application to Continue Freezing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the freezing order against Timis Corporation should be continued
- 2 Whether Gerald Metals S.A. has a good arguable case in conspiracy and deceit
- 3 Whether there is a risk of dissipation of assets
Ratio Decidendi
The freezing order is continued because Gerald Metals S.A. has a good arguable case in conspiracy and deceit, there is a real risk of dissipation of assets, and the criticisms regarding disclosure and prejudice are not persuasive at this stage.
Court Disposition
freezing order continued
Orders
- Freezing order against Timis Corporation is continued to preserve proceeds of Senegal oil interests sale.
- Gerald Metals S.A. to provide cross-undertaking in damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment