Vatish v Crown Prosecution Service
None of the circumstances relied upon by the appellant, individually or cumulatively, could give rise to a realistic argument on apparent bias; the renewed application for permission to appeal is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Vatish; Respondent: Crown Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Apparent Bias, Sexual Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Vatish
Applicant
Crown Prosecution Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal's conduct gave rise to apparent bias against the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
None of the circumstances relied upon by the appellant, individually or cumulatively, could give rise to a realistic argument on apparent bias; the renewed application for permission to appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment