Joseph & Ors, R. v

Joseph & Ors, R. v

The court held that the existing legal regime, including prosecutorial discretion and the abuse of process jurisdiction, is consistent with the UK's international obligations and does not require expansion of the common law defence of duress for victims of trafficking. Each case is fact-specific, and a sufficient nexus between trafficking and offending must be established. For children, compulsion is not required; a direct consequence suffices. The Competent Authority's findings are persuasive but not determinative. In serious cases, especially involving Class A drugs, public policy may justify prosecution even where trafficking is established. Convictions were quashed where fresh...

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant/applicant: Verna Sermanfure Joseph; Appellant/applicant: Alexandra Dorina Craciunescu; Appellant: VCL; Appellant/applicant: NTN; Applicant: Dong Nguyen; Appellant: AA; Intervener: Anti-Slavery International
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (conjoined Appeals and Applications) / Judgment on Appeals and Applications From Conviction and Sentence, Some on Reference From the Criminal Cases Review Commission
Outcome
Mixed: Some appeals allowed and convictions quashed; others dismissed; one adjourned sine die.
Legal Topics
Human Trafficking, Modern Slavery, Duress, Abuse of Process, Public Interest in Prosecution, Retrospective Application of Law, Child Victims of Trafficking, Competent Authority Determinations
Criminal Law Human Rights Law Immigration Law Human Trafficking Modern Slavery Duress Abuse of Process Public Interest in Prosecution +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Verna Sermanfure Joseph

Appellant/applicant

Alexandra Dorina Craciunescu

Appellant/applicant

VCL

Appellant

NTN

Appellant/applicant

Dong Nguyen

Applicant

AA

Appellant

Anti-Slavery International

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (conjoined Appeals and Applications) / Judgment on Appeals and Applications From Conviction and Sentence, Some on Reference From the Criminal Cases Review Commission

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether victims of human trafficking should be prosecuted for crimes committed as a direct consequence of their trafficking
  2. 2 Whether the common law defence of duress should be expanded to align with international obligations and the Modern Slavery Act 2015
  3. 3 The relevance of the Competent Authority's findings to criminal proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the existing legal regime, including prosecutorial discretion and the abuse of process jurisdiction, is consistent with the UK's international obligations and does not require expansion of the common law defence of duress for victims of trafficking. Each case is fact-specific, and a sufficient nexus between trafficking and offending must be established. For children, compulsion is not required; a direct consequence suffices. The Competent Authority's findings are persuasive but not determinative. In serious cases, especially involving Class A drugs, public policy may justify prosecution even where trafficking is established. Convictions were quashed where fresh...

Court Disposition

Mixed: Some appeals allowed and convictions quashed; others dismissed; one adjourned sine die.

Orders

  • Applications for extension of time and leave to appeal refused for Verna Sermanfure Joseph and Alexandra Dorina Craciunescu.
  • Conviction of NTN quashed; appeal allowed.