Signia Wealth Ltd v Vector Trustees Ltd & Ors
Ms. Dauriac was a Bad Leaver under the Articles, as she was in repudiatory breach of her employment contract due to dishonest expense claims, entitling Signia to summarily dismiss her. The compulsory transfer process was not properly followed, so the court determined the fair value of the Dauriac Shares as at 21 January 2015. The Bad Leaver provisions were not penal. Ms. Dauriac was not a whistleblower in relation to the alleged sham invoices, and the expenses investigation was not a sham. There was no conspiracy or inducement of breach. Ms. Dauriac is entitled to damages for the value of her shares as determined by the court, less amounts already paid.
- Parties
- Claimant: Signia Wealth Limited; Defendant: Vector Trustees Limited (as trustee of the Cap Ferret Trust); Defendant: Ms. Nathalie Dauriac-Stoebe; Defendant: New Street Trust Limited (as trustee of the Cap Ferret Trust); Fourth Party: Grecco Limited; Fifth Party: Mr. John Caudwell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/shareholder Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted in favour of Signia as to Bad Leaver status and compulsory transfer process; damages awarded to Ms. Dauriac for the value of her shares as determined by the court; all other claims by Ms. Dauriac dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Share Transfer, Good Leaver/bad Leaver Provisions, Constructive Dismissal, Valuation of Shares, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Contract, Conspiracy to Injure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Signia Wealth Limited
Claimant
Vector Trustees Limited (as trustee of the Cap Ferret Trust)
Defendant
Ms. Nathalie Dauriac-Stoebe
Defendant
New Street Trust Limited (as trustee of the Cap Ferret Trust)
Defendant
Grecco Limited
Fourth Party
Mr. John Caudwell
Fifth Party
Procedural Posture
Commercial/shareholder Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the compulsory transfer process for the Dauriac Shares was properly carried out under the Articles of Association;
- 2 Whether Ms. Dauriac was a Good Leaver or Bad Leaver under the Articles;
- 3 Whether Ms. Dauriac was constructively dismissed;
Ratio Decidendi
Ms. Dauriac was a Bad Leaver under the Articles, as she was in repudiatory breach of her employment contract due to dishonest expense claims, entitling Signia to summarily dismiss her. The compulsory transfer process was not properly followed, so the court determined the fair value of the Dauriac Shares as at 21 January 2015. The Bad Leaver provisions were not penal. Ms. Dauriac was not a whistleblower in relation to the alleged sham invoices, and the expenses investigation was not a sham. There was no conspiracy or inducement of breach. Ms. Dauriac is entitled to damages for the value of her shares as determined by the court, less amounts already paid.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted in favour of Signia as to Bad Leaver status and compulsory transfer process; damages awarded to Ms. Dauriac for the value of her shares as determined by the court; all other claims by Ms. Dauriac dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that Ms. Dauriac was a Bad Leaver under the Articles;
- Declaration that the compulsory transfer process was not properly followed;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment