Cleansing Service Group Ltd v Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
The exemption in Schedule 3 Part II paragraph 2 does not apply unless there is a contractual relationship between the contractor and the occupier of the farm. The appellant was not employed by the occupier of the farm but by Wessex Water, so the exemption did not apply.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cleansing Service Group Limited; Defendant: Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Operator's Licence Exemption, Interpretation of 'keeper', Contractual Relationship Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cleansing Service Group Limited
Claimant
Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exemption in Schedule 3 Part II paragraph 2 of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Regulations 1995 applies to the appellant's use of the vehicle
- 2 Meaning of 'keeper' in the context of the exemption
- 3 Whether a direct contractual relationship is required between the occupier of the farm and the contractor
Ratio Decidendi
The exemption in Schedule 3 Part II paragraph 2 does not apply unless there is a contractual relationship between the contractor and the occupier of the farm. The appellant was not employed by the occupier of the farm but by Wessex Water, so the exemption did not apply.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay respondent's costs of the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment