Vehicle and Operator Services Agency, R (on the application of) v North Leicester Vehicle Movements Ltd & Anor
The tachograph regulations apply to vehicles of a type capable of being used for the carriage of passengers or goods, regardless of the specific purpose of the journey, subject to defined exemptions. The magistrates were incorrect in law to find otherwise.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vehicle and Operator Services Agency; 1st Respondent: North Leicester Vehicle Movements Limited; 2nd Respondent: Albert Field
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; no remission to magistrates; proceedings against both respondents not continued
- Legal Topics
- Tachograph Regulations, Interpretation of EU and UK Transport Legislation, Carriage of Goods by Road, Strict Construction of Criminal Statutes, Purposive Construction of EU Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
Appellant
North Leicester Vehicle Movements Limited
1st Respondent
Albert Field
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a vehicle must have a working tachograph installed when being driven unladen and without a trailer for export under Council Regulation 3821/85 and section 97 of the Transport Act 1968
- 2 Interpretation of 'used for the carriage of passengers or goods by road' in the context of tachograph regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The tachograph regulations apply to vehicles of a type capable of being used for the carriage of passengers or goods, regardless of the specific purpose of the journey, subject to defined exemptions. The magistrates were incorrect in law to find otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; no remission to magistrates; proceedings against both respondents not continued
Orders
- The question posed by the magistrates is answered in the negative; the magistrates were incorrect in law.
- No order for remission to the magistrates in respect of either respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment