Equitix ESI CHP (Sheff) Ltd v Veolia Energy & Utility Services UK Plc

Equitix ESI CHP (Sheff) Ltd v Veolia Energy & Utility Services UK Plc

The O&M Contract provides two parallel dispute resolution streams; clause 7.5 does not exclude the mandatory adjudication procedure under Schedule 8, Part 3 for Interface Disputes, including Alleged Defects. The requirement for 'experts in the field of biomass energy plants' does not mandate technical expertise, and...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Equitix ESI CHP (Sheff) Limited; Defendant: Veolia Energy & Utility Services UK PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil (part 8 Proceedings) / Judgment on Applications for Declarations and Injunctions
Outcome
All declarations sought by Equitix refused; applications dismissed.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Dispute Resolution Clauses, Appointment of Adjudicators, Interface Disputes in Construction Contracts
Contract Law Construction Law Interpretation of Dispute Resolution Clauses Appointment of Adjudicators Interface Disputes in Construction Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Equitix ESI CHP (Sheff) Limited

Claimant

Veolia Energy & Utility Services UK PLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (part 8 Proceedings) / Judgment on Applications for Declarations and Injunctions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Veolia is entitled to commence proceedings under Part 3 of Schedule 8 to the O&M Contract in respect of Alleged Defects subject to a notice under clause 7.5.
  2. 2 Whether the President of the CIArb is obliged to appoint experts with technical expertise in the field of biomass energy plants under Schedule 8, Part 3 of the O&M Contract.
  3. 3 Whether the appointments made by the President of the CIArb were valid under the contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The O&M Contract provides two parallel dispute resolution streams; clause 7.5 does not exclude the mandatory adjudication procedure under Schedule 8, Part 3 for Interface Disputes, including Alleged Defects. The requirement for 'experts in the field of biomass energy plants' does not mandate technical expertise, and the President of the CIArb validly appointed adjudicators with relevant dispute resolution experience.

Court Disposition

All declarations sought by Equitix refused; applications dismissed.

Orders

  • The first declaration sought by Equitix is not granted.
  • The further declarations regarding the validity of the CIArb appointments are not granted.