HM Attorney General v Foden

HM Attorney General v Foden

The defendant has become a compulsive litigant whose persistent and meritless litigation is clearly vexatious, justifying the making of a Civil Proceedings Order without limit of time under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981.

Parties
Claimant: Her Majesty's Attorney General; Defendant: Veronica Beryl Foden
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Civil Proceedings Order / Final Judgment
Outcome
Civil Proceedings Order granted without limit of time
Legal Topics
Vexatious Litigation, Civil Proceedings Order, Section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty's Attorney General

Claimant

Veronica Beryl Foden

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Civil Proceedings Order / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious civil proceedings without reasonable ground under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981
  2. 2 Whether a Civil Proceedings Order should be made against the defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant has become a compulsive litigant whose persistent and meritless litigation is clearly vexatious, justifying the making of a Civil Proceedings Order without limit of time under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981.

Court Disposition

Civil Proceedings Order granted without limit of time

Orders

  • A Civil Proceedings Order is made against Veronica Beryl Foden pursuant to section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981, without limit of time.