Intel Corporation v Via Technologies Inc & Ors [2002] EWHC 1159 (Ch) (14 June 2002)
The court held that the competition law defences raised by VIA, including abuse of dominant position and anti-competitive agreement, disclosed arguable issues of law and fact that could not be determined summarily or struck out as abusive. The issues concerning the scope and effect of the licence agreements, the alleged abuse of dominance, and the compatibility of the contractual restrictions with competition law required full investigation at trial. Accordingly, Intel's applications to strike out the defences or for summary judgment were refused.
- Citation
- [2002] EWHC 1159 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Intel Corporation; Defendant: VIA Technologies Inc; Defendant: Elitegroup Computer Systems (UK) Limited; Defendant: VIA Technologies (Europe) Limited; Defendant: Realtime Distribution Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Patent and Competition Law Claim (two Actions: Chipset and Cpu) / Application by Intel to Strike Out Defences or for Summary Judgment on Defence and Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Intel's applications to strike out the competition law defences or for summary judgment refused; defences to proceed to trial.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Licensing, Abuse of Dominant Position, Anti Competitive Agreements, Cross Licensing, Market Partitioning, Refusal to License, Settlement Agreements, Article 81 EC Treaty, Article 82 EC Treaty, Competition Act 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Intel Corporation
Claimant
VIA Technologies Inc
Defendant
Elitegroup Computer Systems (UK) Limited
Defendant
VIA Technologies (Europe) Limited
Defendant
Realtime Distribution Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent and Competition Law Claim (two Actions: Chipset and Cpu) / Application by Intel to Strike Out Defences or for Summary Judgment on Defence and Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Intel's refusal to license patents or its licensing terms constitute an abuse of dominant position under Article 82 EC Treaty and/or section 18 Competition Act 1998
- 2 Whether the restrictions in the chipset licence agreements are void or unenforceable under Article 81 EC Treaty and/or section 2 Competition Act 1998
- 3 Whether VIA is already licensed under the revised chipset licence agreement for Pentium 4 chipsets
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the competition law defences raised by VIA, including abuse of dominant position and anti-competitive agreement, disclosed arguable issues of law and fact that could not be determined summarily or struck out as abusive. The issues concerning the scope and effect of the licence agreements, the alleged abuse of dominance, and the compatibility of the contractual restrictions with competition law required full investigation at trial. Accordingly, Intel's applications to strike out the defences or for summary judgment were refused.
Court Disposition
Intel's applications to strike out the competition law defences or for summary judgment refused; defences to proceed to trial.
Orders
- Applications to strike out or for summary judgment dismissed.
- Defences and counterclaims to proceed to trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment