R v Victor Nzekwu & Anor

R v Victor Nzekwu & Anor

The judge's exclusion of evidence regarding NCA meetings was erroneous but immaterial to the safety of the conviction. The exclusion of parts of the defence expert report was correct as they were irrelevant. There was sufficient evidence for the jury to infer Nzekwu's knowing participation in the conspiracy. Sentences imposed were within guideline ranges and not manifestly excessive given aggravating features.

Parties
Appellant: Victor Nzekwu; Applicant: Kasim Mohammed; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy, Drug Importation, Sentencing, Admissibility of Evidence, Disclosure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Victor Nzekwu

Appellant

Kasim Mohammed

Applicant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in excluding evidence of NCA meetings with Nzekwu
  2. 2 Whether exclusion of parts of the defence expert report was correct
  3. 3 Whether there was a case to answer against Nzekwu

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's exclusion of evidence regarding NCA meetings was erroneous but immaterial to the safety of the conviction. The exclusion of parts of the defence expert report was correct as they were irrelevant. There was sufficient evidence for the jury to infer Nzekwu's knowing participation in the conspiracy. Sentences imposed were within guideline ranges and not manifestly excessive given aggravating features.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Nzekwu's appeal against conviction dismissed
  • Nzekwu's appeal against sentence dismissed