Verdol, R. v [2015] EWCA Crim 502 (03 March 2015)
The trial judge was correct to refuse the proposed cross-examination of child A and D due to lack of evidential foundation and failure to meet statutory criteria for bad character evidence. The judge was also correct to admit the applicant's bad character evidence as the statutory gateways were open and it was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Crim 502
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Victor Verdol
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Child Cruelty, Bad Character Evidence, Cross Examination of Witnesses, Admissibility of Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Victor Verdol
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to allow cross-examination of a child complainant about an alleged staged kidnapping and false sexual assault allegation
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to allow cross-examination of a child complainant about an allegation made by another child
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of the applicant's bad character (drug dealing)
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was correct to refuse the proposed cross-examination of child A and D due to lack of evidential foundation and failure to meet statutory criteria for bad character evidence. The judge was also correct to admit the applicant's bad character evidence as the statutory gateways were open and it was necessary to avoid misleading the jury.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction is dismissed.
- Order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 prohibiting identification of child complainants or witnesses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment