Nursing and Midwifery Council, R (on the application of) v Rojas

Nursing and Midwifery Council, R (on the application of) v Rojas

There is sufficient material to conclude the respondent is unfit to practise, and no procedural unfairness or breach of rights has been established. The extension of the interim suspension order is justified.

Parties
Claimant: Nursing and Midwifery Council; Defendant: Victoria Rojas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Interim Suspension, Fitness to Practise, Procedural Fairness, Human Rights
Administrative Law Professional Regulation Interim Suspension Fitness to Practise Procedural Fairness Human Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nursing and Midwifery Council

Claimant

Victoria Rojas

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a basis to conclude the respondent is unfit to practise
  2. 2 Whether there are procedural or fairness reasons to refuse the extension, including under the Convention of Human Rights

Ratio Decidendi

There is sufficient material to conclude the respondent is unfit to practise, and no procedural unfairness or breach of rights has been established. The extension of the interim suspension order is justified.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Extension of interim suspension order for 12 months granted