Parekh, R. v

Parekh, R. v

The sentence of 18 months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive. The Recorder properly considered the guidelines, the appellant's lack of greed motivation, and the significant mitigation, but the circumstances were not exceptional to justify departing from the guidelines. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Vijay Parekh
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Theft, Sentencing, Mitigation, Breach of Trust
Criminal Law Theft Sentencing Mitigation Breach of Trust

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Vijay Parekh

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 18 months' imprisonment for theft was manifestly excessive given the mitigation and circumstances of the offence
  2. 2 Whether the case was exceptional so as to justify a sentence outside the sentencing guidelines

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 18 months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive. The Recorder properly considered the guidelines, the appellant's lack of greed motivation, and the significant mitigation, but the circumstances were not exceptional to justify departing from the guidelines. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The sentence of 18 months' imprisonment is upheld.