Ansari v Knowles & Ors

Ansari v Knowles & Ors

The appeal was dismissed because the settlement with Vilnius University did not extinguish Mr. Ansari's claim against Dr. Knowles and MMU, and it was not an abuse of process to continue the claim. The court found that the Vilnius Memo constituted a real and substantial tort, and Mr. Ansari had not received full vindication from Dr. Knowles or MMU. The costs and proportionality arguments did not justify striking out the claim at this stage.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Khalid Mahmood Ansari; Defendant/appellant: Timothy Knowles; Defendant/appellant: Manchester Metropolitan University; Defendant: Viktorija Zilinskaite; Defendant: Vilnius University
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Preliminary Issues Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Qualified Privilege, Justification, Malice, Damages, Case Management
Defamation Civil Procedure Abuse of Process Qualified Privilege Justification Malice Damages Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khalid Mahmood Ansari

Claimant/respondent

Timothy Knowles

Defendant/appellant

Manchester Metropolitan University

Defendant/appellant

Viktorija Zilinskaite

Defendant

Vilnius University

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Preliminary Issues Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the settlement with Vilnius University extinguished or rendered abusive the claimant's ongoing claims against Dr. Knowles and MMU for defamation arising from the Vilnius Memo
  2. 2 Whether the claim against Dr. Knowles and MMU should be struck out as an abuse of process under the Jameel principle

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the settlement with Vilnius University did not extinguish Mr. Ansari's claim against Dr. Knowles and MMU, and it was not an abuse of process to continue the claim. The court found that the Vilnius Memo constituted a real and substantial tort, and Mr. Ansari had not received full vindication from Dr. Knowles or MMU. The costs and proportionality arguments did not justify striking out the claim at this stage.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Dr. Knowles and MMU is dismissed.
  • The claim against Dr. Knowles and MMU based on the Vilnius Memo is not struck out as an abuse of process.