Kizlaite & Anor, R. v
The sentences imposed, though severe, were fully justified given the callous, systematic, and brutal exploitation of the victims, and were necessary to mark the gravity of the offences and deter others from similar conduct. The mitigating factors were properly considered by the sentencing judges.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Vilma Kizlaite; Appellant: Tasim Axhami
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation, False Imprisonment, Rape, Causing a Person to Engage in Sexual Activity Without Consent, Inciting Prostitution for Gain, Controlling Prostitution for Gain, Sentencing, Mitigation, Deportation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Vilma Kizlaite
Appellant
Tasim Axhami
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on Vilma Kizlaite and Tasim Axhami were manifestly excessive given the mitigating circumstances
- 2 Appropriateness of the sentences for offences of trafficking, rape, false imprisonment, and related sexual offences
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed, though severe, were fully justified given the callous, systematic, and brutal exploitation of the victims, and were necessary to mark the gravity of the offences and deter others from similar conduct. The mitigating factors were properly considered by the sentencing judges.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeals against sentence by Vilma Kizlaite and Tasim Axhami are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment