Graham, R. v [2014] EWCA Crim 1594 (22 July 2014)

Graham, R. v [2014] EWCA Crim 1594 (22 July 2014)

The application for leave to appeal contained no arguable ground and was properly struck out as frivolous or vexatious.

Citation
[2014] EWCA Crim 1594
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Vincent Harold Graham; Applicant's Solicitors: Henry's Solicitors; Counsel for Henry's Solicitors: Mr Shrimpton
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Outcome
application summarily dismissed
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Appeal Procedure, Solicitor Conduct, Governance
Criminal Law Confiscation Order Appeal Procedure Solicitor Conduct Governance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Vincent Harold Graham

Applicant

Henry's Solicitors

Applicant's Solicitors

Mr Shrimpton

Counsel for Henry's Solicitors

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal against the confiscation order was properly formulated
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be struck out as frivolous or vexatious
  3. 3 Whether there were compliance and governance issues regarding solicitor representation

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave to appeal contained no arguable ground and was properly struck out as frivolous or vexatious.

Court Disposition

application summarily dismissed

Orders

  • application for leave to appeal is struck out
  • papers referred to Solicitors Regulatory Authority