Beumer Group UK Ltd v Vinci Construction UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 2283 (TCC) (13 September 2016)
The adjudicator's failure to disclose his contemporaneous appointment in a related adjudication involving Beumer, combined with Beumer's advancement of factually inconsistent cases in the two adjudications and the resulting deprivation of Vinci's opportunity to make submissions on this inconsistency, constituted a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 2283 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Beumer Group UK Ltd; Defendant: Vinci Construction UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Summary Judgment (cpr Part 24) to Enforce Adjudicator's Decision / First Instance, Post Adjudication Enforcement
- Outcome
- Summary judgment refused; adjudicator's decision not enforced due to material breach of natural justice.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Natural Justice, Bias and Disclosure, Summary Judgment, Compensation Events, Delay and Extensions of Time
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beumer Group UK Ltd
Claimant
Vinci Construction UK Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Judgment (cpr Part 24) to Enforce Adjudicator's Decision / First Instance, Post Adjudication Enforcement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Beumer advanced factually inconsistent cases in two simultaneous adjudications (BV II and BL II)
- 2 Whether Vinci was entitled to disclosure of relevant material from BL II
- 3 Whether the adjudicator (Dr Chern) should have disclosed his contemporaneous appointment in BL II to Vinci
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator's failure to disclose his contemporaneous appointment in a related adjudication involving Beumer, combined with Beumer's advancement of factually inconsistent cases in the two adjudications and the resulting deprivation of Vinci's opportunity to make submissions on this inconsistency, constituted a material breach of natural justice. This breach was sufficiently serious to justify refusal of summary judgment enforcing the adjudicator's decision.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment refused; adjudicator's decision not enforced due to material breach of natural justice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment