Arcadia Group Brands Ltd & Ors v Visa Inc & Ors
Facts sufficient to plead a prima facie case were available to claimants before limitation dates; section 32(1)(b) does not suspend limitation as no essential facts were concealed; claims for breaches prior to limitation dates are time-barred.
- Parties
- Claimant: Arcadia Group Brands Limited and others; Claimant: Asda Stores Limited; Claimant: B&Q Plc; Claimant: Comet Group Limited (in liquidation); Claimant: Debenhams Retail Plc and others; Claimant: House of Fraser (Stores) Limited; Claimant: Iceland Foods Limited; Claimant: New Look Retailers Limited; Claimant: Next Retail Limited; Claimant: Record 2 Shop Limited (in liquidation); Claimant: WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc; Claimant: Argos Limited and others; Defendant: Visa Inc; Defendant: Visa International Service Association; Defendant: Visa Europe Limited; Defendant: Visa Europe Services Inc; Defendant: Visa UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim / Application for Strike Out and Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period, Breach of Statutory Duty, Multilateral Interchange Fees, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Concealment, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arcadia Group Brands Limited and others
Claimant
Asda Stores Limited
Claimant
B&Q Plc
Claimant
Comet Group Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant
Debenhams Retail Plc and others
Claimant
House of Fraser (Stores) Limited
Claimant
Iceland Foods Limited
Claimant
New Look Retailers Limited
Claimant
Next Retail Limited
Claimant
Record 2 Shop Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant
WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc
Claimant
Argos Limited and others
Claimant
Visa Inc
Defendant
Visa International Service Association
Defendant
Visa Europe Limited
Defendant
Visa Europe Services Inc
Defendant
Visa UK Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim / Application for Strike Out and Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claims for breaches of competition law prior to limitation dates are time-barred
- 2 Whether section 32(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980 postpones limitation due to deliberate concealment
- 3 Whether claimants had sufficient knowledge to plead a prima facie case before limitation dates
Ratio Decidendi
Facts sufficient to plead a prima facie case were available to claimants before limitation dates; section 32(1)(b) does not suspend limitation as no essential facts were concealed; claims for breaches prior to limitation dates are time-barred.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Claims relating to breaches of competition law prior to limitation dates are struck out as time-barred.
- Summary judgment entered for defendants on limitation issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment